Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(6): 1064-1066, 2021 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1132452

ABSTRACT

We enrolled 91 consecutive inpatients with COVID-19 at 6 hospitals in Toronto, Canada, and tested 1 nasopharyngeal swab/saliva sample pair from each patient using real-time RT-PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Sensitivity was 89% for nasopharyngeal swabs and 72% for saliva (P = .02). Difference in sensitivity was greatest for sample pairs collected later in illness.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Canada , Humans , Nasopharynx , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Saliva
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(8): 1001-1003, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-977236

ABSTRACT

To compare sensitivity of specimens for COVID-19 diagnosis, we tested 151 nasopharyngeal/midturbinate swab pairs from 117 COVID-19 inpatients using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Sensitivity was 94% for nasopharyngeal and 75% for midturbinate swabs (P = .0001). In 88 nasopharyngeal/midturbinate pairs with matched saliva, sensitivity was 86% for nasopharyngeal swabs and 88% for combined midturbinate swabs/saliva.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Nasopharynx , Saliva , Specimen Handling
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL